🔗 Share this article

The iPhone maker could be required to allow rivals to operate their own app stores on Apple devices in the UK, after a decision from the market watchdog.

This would be a significant change to the company's infamous "walled garden" where applications can only be installed from its own App Store.

But the Competition and Markets Authority has classified both Apple and Google as having "strategic market status" - effectively saying they have significant control over mobile platforms.

Regulatory Assessment

The CMA said the tech firms "could be restricting innovation and market rivalry".

But the regulator clarified it did not "determine or presume misconduct" from the firms.

"The app economy generates one and a half percent of the UK's GDP and sustains around 400,000 jobs, which is why it's crucial these markets function properly for enterprises," commented a senior official from the competition authority.

Approximately ninety to one hundred percent of British smartphones run on Apple or Google's mobile platforms, creating what the authority calls an "effective duopoly".

According to current data, nearly half of British smartphone users own an Apple device - which runs the iOS operating system - with the overwhelming bulk of the remaining users using Google's Android.

Apple's Response

The CMA's investigation focused on how prominent the companies' own applications are versus rivals - as well as their browsers and operating systems.

It is unknown what modifications the authority will look to request, but earlier it published roadmaps detailing potential measures it could take.

These include requiring it to be more straightforward for people to switch between Apple and Android phones, and for both firms to rank apps "in a fair, objective and transparent manner" in their marketplaces.

Apple specifically may be compelled to allow alternative app stores on its products, and let people to download programs directly from developer sites.

This would follow comparable regulations in the European Union, which previously took action against the company for restrictive practices.

Apple warned the United Kingdom could lose access to receiving updates - as has occurred in the European Union - which the company blames on heavy regulation.

For instance, some AI capabilities which have been rolled out in other regions are not accessible in the European market.

"We encounters intense rivalry in every market where we do business, and we strive continuously to create the best products, services and user experience," the organization said in a release.

"The UK's adoption of European regulations would weaken that, resulting in consumers with weaker privacy and security, slower availability to new features, and a divided, less seamless user journey."

Google's Standpoint

Android users can presently use third-party app stores - though critics say they are not as user-friendly as the company's official Play Store.

The regulator's plan said the search company may have to "modify the interface" of installing applications directly from online sources, as well as "remove user frictions" when using third-party platforms.

"We simply do not see the justification for today's designation decision," a company policy executive stated.

The representative said "the majority" of Google device owners use third-party platforms or download apps straight from a developer's website, and asserted there is a far greater range of apps available for Google device owners versus those on iOS products.

"There are now 24,000 Google-compatible devices from 1,300 phone manufacturers globally, facing intense competition from Apple's platform in the United Kingdom," the representative continued.

Android is an open-source operating system, which means creators can utilize and develop on top of it for no cost.

The company argues this means it opens up market competition.

But advocacy organizations said restrictions on these firms' dominance in other countries "currently assist enterprises to develop and giving consumers more choice".

"Their dominance is now causing real harm by limiting options for users and market rivalry for businesses," commented a policy expert.